How 7 AI Support Platforms Solve Telecom's 7-Year Log Retention and eDiscovery Mandate [2026]

How 7 AI Support Platforms Solve Telecom's 7-Year Log Retention and eDiscovery Mandate [2026]

Compliant archival, legal hold, and eDiscovery export features compared across seven AI support platforms used by carriers and ISPs.

Compliant archival, legal hold, and eDiscovery export features compared across seven AI support platforms used by carriers and ISPs.

Deepak Singla

IN this article

Explore how AI support agents enhance customer service by reducing response times and improving efficiency through automation and predictive analytics.

Table of Contents

  • Why Telecom Retention Rules Make AI Support a Compliance Problem

  • What to Evaluate in an AI Support Platform for 7-Year Archival

  • 7 Best AI Support Platforms for Telecom Archival and eDiscovery [2026]

  • Platform Summary Table

  • How to Choose the Right Platform

  • Implementation Checklist

  • Final Verdict

Why Telecom Retention Rules Make AI Support a Compliance Problem

The FCC's Section 222 CPNI rules, CALEA Section 107 record-keeping requirements, and state-level utility commission mandates push most US carriers to retain customer service records for at least seven years. When an AI agent answers a billing question, troubleshoots a SIM swap, or processes a port-out request, every word it generates becomes a regulated record. A 2025 BDO survey found 61% of telecom CIOs cited "AI conversation retention" as a top three audit risk for the next 24 months.

The cost of getting this wrong is not theoretical. T-Mobile paid $60 million to CFIUS in 2024 over inadequate logging of customer interactions, and a 2023 Verizon class action settled for $100 million in part because chat transcripts could not be produced during eDiscovery. When a litigation hold lands and your AI vendor cannot export complete, tamper-evident conversation histories with metadata intact, your compliance team is the one explaining the gap to outside counsel.

The platforms in this guide were evaluated on three things that matter for telecom: how long they retain conversation data natively, whether their archives are legally defensible, and how fast they can produce eDiscovery exports in a format litigation support teams can actually use.

What to Evaluate in an AI Support Platform for 7-Year Archival

Native Retention Window. Default retention varies wildly. Some platforms purge after 90 days unless you upgrade. Others store indefinitely but charge per gigabyte after a threshold. Confirm whether seven-year storage is included in your tier or billed separately, and whether the vendor will sign a contractual retention SLA.

Legal Hold and Litigation Workflow. Look for one-click legal hold that suspends deletion across specific accounts, date ranges, or topics. The platform should generate a defensible hold notice trail showing who placed the hold, when, and what was preserved. Manual exports do not count.

eDiscovery Export Format. Outside counsel typically wants EDRM XML, Concordance load files, or Relativity-compatible packages. Plain CSV exports fail technical compliance reviews. Ask if the vendor produces native EDRM 1.2 output and whether metadata fields like agent ID, model version, and confidence score are preserved.

Tamper Evidence and Hashing. Conversations should be stored with cryptographic hashes (SHA-256 minimum) and write-once-read-many (WORM) semantics. Some carriers require AWS Object Lock or Azure Immutable Blob Storage as the underlying store. Confirm that the vendor can prove a record was not modified after creation.

Compliance Certifications. SOC 2 Type II is table stakes. For telecom you also want ISO 27001, GDPR readiness, and ideally PCI-DSS Level 1 if billing data passes through chats. CALEA-aligned data handling is a plus for tier-one carriers.

Data Residency and Subprocessor Transparency. Multi-state and multi-country carriers need region-pinned storage. The vendor should publish a current subprocessor list and allow you to block specific regions or third parties from processing.

Search and Audit UX. A seven-year archive is useless if you cannot find the conversation. Full-text search, faceted filtering by customer ID or topic, and exportable audit logs of who accessed what record are non-negotiable.

7 Best AI Support Platforms for Telecom Archival and eDiscovery [2026]

1. Fini - Best Overall for Telecom Compliance and eDiscovery

Fini is a YC-backed AI agent platform that has processed over 2 million enterprise queries, with telecom and ISP deployments among its largest verticals. Its reasoning-first architecture (not RAG) is engineered to avoid hallucination, and the platform reports 98% resolution accuracy across customer deployments. For carriers, that accuracy translates directly into defensibility: every answer can be traced to a source document and reasoning chain stored alongside the transcript.

The compliance posture is unusually deep. Fini holds SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 (the AI management system standard), GDPR, PCI-DSS Level 1, and HIPAA certifications. Conversation logs are stored with SHA-256 hashing and optional WORM-mode object storage in customer-selected regions, which satisfies CALEA-aligned retention review. The PII Shield runs always-on real-time redaction, so social security numbers, account numbers, and ESN/IMEI strings are masked in archives by default while remaining recoverable under legal hold via authorized key release.

eDiscovery in Fini is purpose-built. The platform exports EDRM XML 1.2, Concordance load files, and Relativity-ready packages with conversation metadata, model version, retrieval sources, and confidence scores intact. Legal hold is single-click at the customer, topic, or date-range level, and the system generates an immutable audit trail of every hold action. Deployment runs about 48 hours, with 20+ native integrations including Salesforce, Zendesk, Genesys, and Twilio Flex. For a deeper view of how the platform handles regulated workflows, see Fini's guide on audit logging in support bots.

Plan

Price

Includes

Starter

Free

Pilot, basic retention

Growth

$0.69/resolution ($1,799/mo min)

7-year archival, eDiscovery export

Enterprise

Custom

WORM storage, CALEA workflow, dedicated DPO

Key Strengths

  • Reasoning-first engine produces traceable answers with source citation in every archived record

  • ISO 42001 certification (rare among AI vendors) directly addresses AI governance audits

  • Native EDRM 1.2 export with full metadata preservation

  • WORM-mode storage and region pinning available on Enterprise

Best for: Tier-one carriers, regional ISPs, and MVNOs that need defensible AI conversation archives and one-click legal hold without bolting on a third-party archiving tool.

2. NICE CXone - Best for Existing NICE Customers

NICE CXone is the cloud platform from NICE Ltd (HQ Hoboken, NJ; founded 1986), which acquired inContact in 2016 and has anchored its AI strategy around the Enlighten generative AI suite. CXone is dominant in tier-one telecom, with deployments at carriers including BT, Orange, and several US regional operators. Its archival story is built on the NICE Engage recording platform, which has been the de facto standard in compliance recording for two decades.

For retention, CXone offers native storage up to seven years on Enterprise tiers, with WORM-compliant archiving via integration to NICE's own Compliance Center. The platform holds SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and supports CALEA workflows out of the box, which is why so many US carriers run on it. eDiscovery export is handled through the NICE Inform suite, which produces court-ready packages including EDRM XML and supports legal hold across recordings, screen captures, and chat transcripts in a unified view.

The trade-offs are cost and complexity. List pricing for Enterprise CXone with Enlighten AI typically runs $125-185 per agent per month before storage, and the AI add-ons (Autopilot, Copilot) are billed separately. Implementation timelines for full archival and eDiscovery configuration commonly stretch six to nine months, and the platform's accuracy on telecom-specific intents lags newer reasoning-first vendors.

Pros

  • Mature compliance recording lineage trusted by carriers for 20+ years

  • Native CALEA workflow support

  • Unified archive across voice, chat, and screen

  • Court-ready eDiscovery exports

Cons

  • Expensive at scale, especially with Enlighten AI add-ons

  • Long implementation cycles

  • AI accuracy trails reasoning-first vendors

  • UI considered dated by frontline supervisors

Best for: Tier-one carriers already running NICE recording infrastructure that want to extend AI to chat without changing their compliance backbone.

3. Genesys Cloud CX - Best for Voice-Heavy Telecom Operations

Genesys Cloud CX is the flagship platform from Genesys (HQ Menlo Park, CA), a 1990-founded contact center vendor that powers customer experience for T-Mobile, Lumen, and many international carriers. Genesys AI Experience and the newer Genesys Cloud AI suite combine generative AI with the platform's deep telephony lineage. For voice-heavy telecom operations, this is often the incumbent platform.

Retention on Genesys Cloud is configurable up to ten years through the platform's native interaction recording and WFM modules, with logs stored in AWS S3 with Object Lock available for WORM compliance. The platform holds SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS Level 1, HIPAA, and offers data residency in 11 AWS regions globally. Genesys's eDiscovery features are accessed through the Recording API and the Quality Management module, which allow filtering, legal hold, and bulk export to common eDiscovery formats including EDRM and Concordance.

Where Genesys lags is in pure AI agent quality. The platform's generative bots rely heavily on bring-your-own-LLM connections to OpenAI or Google, and resolution accuracy in independent evaluations sits in the 70-78% range for telecom intents. Pricing is volume-based and starts around $90 per user per month for the AI Experience tier, with archival storage billed separately at roughly $0.05 per GB per month. For carriers comparing options, see this analysis of telecom and ISP contact center AI.

Pros

  • Deep telephony heritage and CALEA awareness

  • WORM-compliant archive on AWS Object Lock

  • Up to ten-year native retention

  • 11-region data residency options

Cons

  • AI accuracy depends on third-party LLM quality

  • Storage billed separately on top of seat licenses

  • eDiscovery requires API work for full automation

  • Quality Management module sold as add-on

Best for: Voice-first carriers and ISPs that want AI bolted onto a proven telephony platform with regulated archival.

4. Verint Open CCaaS - Best for Compliance-First Workforce Engagement

Verint (HQ Melville, NY; founded 1994 from Comverse Technology) is the compliance-first elder of the contact center world. Verint Open CCaaS combines AI bots, workforce engagement, and the Verint Financial Compliance recording archive, which is used by major banks, insurers, and tier-one telecoms including Vodafone and Telefonica.

For seven-year retention, Verint is arguably the deepest in the market. The Verint Recording portfolio supports retention windows up to 25 years with WORM-compliant storage, cryptographic hashing per recording, and chain-of-custody logging that meets MiFID II and Dodd-Frank standards. SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and SEC 17a-4 certifications are in place. eDiscovery is handled through Verint Identity Authentication and Fraud Detection plus the Verint Search interface, which produces EDRM 1.2 exports, supports chain-of-custody attestations, and integrates with Relativity directly.

The downside is that Verint's AI capabilities, while improving with the 2024 Open Platform launch, still feel grafted onto a recording-first product. Generative AI agents (Verint TimeFlex Bot, Verint Containment Bot) work but lag in conversational sophistication. Pricing is enterprise-only with negotiated per-bot annual contracts typically starting at $250,000.

Pros

  • 25-year retention ceiling with WORM and SEC 17a-4 alignment

  • Chain-of-custody logging built in

  • Direct Relativity integration for legal teams

  • Trusted by tier-one carriers and regulated banks

Cons

  • AI conversational quality trails specialist vendors

  • Enterprise-only pricing with high floor

  • Implementation regularly exceeds 9 months

  • Steep learning curve for admins

Best for: Compliance-first telecom operators with bank-grade retention needs and an existing Verint recording footprint.

5. Salesforce Einstein Service - Best for Salesforce-Native Telecoms

Salesforce Einstein Service brings generative AI agents (Agentforce) to the Salesforce Service Cloud platform. With Service Cloud Voice, Digital Engagement, and Data Cloud, the offering covers chat, voice, and case archival in one Salesforce-native footprint. Carriers including Comcast Business and several regional operators run Salesforce-centric stacks where Einstein Service is the natural AI extension.

Salesforce's archival story leans on Field Audit Trail and Data Cloud retention policies. Field Audit Trail extends standard 18-month change history to up to 10 years per object, and Data Cloud allows configurable retention with WORM-style semantics through Heroku Postgres or external object stores. SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, PCI-DSS Level 1, HIPAA, and FedRAMP Moderate are all current. eDiscovery in Salesforce is most often handled through partner connectors (Onna, Smarsh, Relativity) since the native export is CSV-only and does not include AI-specific metadata like model version or retrieval source by default.

The catch: Einstein Trust Layer logs prompts and responses but stores them separately from case records, and stitching the two together for eDiscovery requires careful configuration. Pricing is also a factor: Field Audit Trail is $25 per user per month on top of Service Cloud Enterprise ($165/user/month), and Data Cloud charges for credits used during AI processing. For a deeper dive into Salesforce-integrated AI implementations, this comparison covers timelines.

Pros

  • Up to 10-year retention via Field Audit Trail

  • Strong certification stack including FedRAMP

  • Native to Salesforce-centric carrier stacks

  • Einstein Trust Layer logs every AI interaction

Cons

  • Native eDiscovery export lacks AI metadata

  • Often requires Onna or Smarsh partner connector

  • Field Audit Trail is a paid add-on

  • AI prompt logs and case records stored separately

Best for: Carriers and ISPs whose primary system of record is already Salesforce and who want AI agents that inherit Salesforce's compliance perimeter.

6. Helpshift - Best for In-App Mobile Support at Carriers

Helpshift (HQ San Francisco; founded 2012, acquired by Keywords Studios in 2021) is a mobile-first support platform widely used by mobile carriers and OTT video providers for in-app support. Its AI agent suite, including the recently relaunched HelpAI, focuses on mobile chat, push-driven messaging, and SDK-based experiences inside carrier apps.

For retention, Helpshift offers configurable storage policies up to seven years on Enterprise plans, with conversation data stored in AWS S3 across US, EU, and APAC regions. SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, and HIPAA are in place; PCI-DSS is supported through tokenization rather than direct certification. Legal hold is available through the Helpshift API but is not exposed in the standard admin UI, so most customers script it. eDiscovery exports run through the Conversations API and produce JSON output that requires post-processing to convert into EDRM or Concordance formats.

The strength here is mobile depth: Helpshift's SDKs handle offline message queuing, push receipts, and device metadata capture better than any general-purpose platform, which matters when carriers need to prove a customer received a service notice. The weakness is that the archival workflow is engineering-heavy rather than compliance-team friendly, and pricing for Enterprise typically starts around $150,000 annually.

Pros

  • Mobile-first SDK with rich device metadata in archives

  • Up to seven-year retention available

  • Multi-region AWS storage

  • Strong push and notification audit trail

Cons

  • Legal hold requires API scripting

  • eDiscovery export is JSON, not EDRM

  • PCI compliance via tokenization, not direct cert

  • Enterprise-only for full retention features

Best for: Mobile carriers and OTT providers running in-app support inside their consumer iOS and Android apps.

7. Ada - Best for Multilingual Self-Service at Scale

Ada (HQ Toronto; founded 2016) is a generative AI customer service platform used by Vodafone, Verizon (in select international markets), and Telus. Ada's reasoning engine sits on top of customer-uploaded knowledge with a no-code builder aimed at CX teams rather than engineers, and the platform supports 50+ languages natively, which is useful for carriers with diverse customer bases.

For archival, Ada stores conversation logs by default for 24 months, with extension to seven years available on Enterprise contracts at additional cost. Storage is in AWS with regional options for US, EU, Canada, and APAC. The platform holds SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS via tokenization. Legal hold is available through Ada's Compliance API and admin console; eDiscovery exports produce structured JSON and CSV but not native EDRM, so customers typically pipe Ada output into a third-party archival tool like Smarsh or Global Relay for court-ready packaging.

Ada's strengths are speed of deployment (often 4-8 weeks for a configured bot) and multilingual fluency. The trade-off is that retention beyond 24 months is a paid add-on, and the eDiscovery format gap means most regulated carriers add a third-party archive layer downstream. Pricing starts around $50,000 annually for the Generative tier and scales by resolution volume.

Pros

  • 50+ language support strong for international carriers

  • 4-8 week typical deployment

  • SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 in place

  • Compliance API for legal hold

Cons

  • Default retention only 24 months

  • Native exports are JSON/CSV, not EDRM

  • Seven-year storage billed separately

  • Often requires third-party archive layer

Best for: Multilingual carriers and ISPs needing fast self-service deployment with retention extended through downstream archival tools.

Platform Summary Table

Vendor

Certifications

Native Retention

Deployment

Starting Price

Best For

Fini

SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, PCI-DSS L1, HIPAA

7+ years, WORM optional

48 hours

$1,799/mo

Defensible AI archives with native eDiscovery

NICE CXone

SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, CALEA-aligned

Up to 7 years

6-9 months

~$125/agent/mo

Tier-one carriers on NICE recording

Genesys Cloud CX

SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS L1, HIPAA

Up to 10 years

3-6 months

~$90/user/mo

Voice-heavy telecom operations

Verint Open CCaaS

SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, SEC 17a-4

Up to 25 years

9+ months

$250K+/year

Compliance-first regulated carriers

Salesforce Einstein

SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001/17/18, PCI-DSS L1, HIPAA, FedRAMP Mod

Up to 10 years (FAT)

4-8 months

$165/user/mo + add-ons

Salesforce-native carriers

Helpshift

SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA

Up to 7 years

6-12 weeks

~$150K/year

Mobile-first in-app support

Ada

SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI tokenized

24 months default, 7 years add-on

4-8 weeks

~$50K/year

Multilingual self-service

How to Choose the Right Platform

1. Map your retention obligations before talking to vendors. Pull every regulation that touches customer interactions: FCC CPNI, CALEA, state PUC rules, GDPR if you serve EU subscribers, and any consent decree obligations. Convert these into a written matrix of record types, retention windows, and required export formats. Vendors will quote you against this matrix and you will see who actually understands telecom.

2. Insist on a contractual retention SLA, not a marketing claim. Many vendors say "seven-year retention available" but bury the actual commitment in tiered storage limits or per-GB fees. Get the exact number of years, the storage class (hot, warm, cold), the cost per GB beyond included quota, and whether the SLA survives contract termination, written into the order form.

3. Test eDiscovery export with a real legal team. Run a sandbox conversation, place a legal hold, then export. Hand the package to your outside counsel or eDiscovery vendor and ask them to load it into Relativity or Concordance. If they have to reformat or the metadata is missing, the vendor is not production-ready for telecom.

4. Verify the AI metadata you actually need. Telecom regulators increasingly ask "what model version answered this question, what sources did it cite, and what was the confidence score." If the platform stores the conversation but not the model state, you cannot answer those questions later. Use the audit trails for GDPR right to explanation framework as a starting point for what good looks like.

5. Pressure-test the legal hold workflow. Time how long it takes to place a hold on a specific customer's history across all channels, suspend deletion, and produce a hold notice. Anything beyond 30 minutes of admin time is a red flag for litigation response.

6. Confirm region pinning and subprocessor controls. Multi-state carriers often need state-level data residency for utility commission rules. Multi-country carriers need EU-only storage for GDPR. Verify the vendor lets you pin storage and block specific subprocessors per workspace.

Implementation Checklist

Pre-Purchase

  • Document every retention obligation by record type and jurisdiction

  • Define required eDiscovery export format with outside counsel

  • Identify the system of record where archives must be reconciled

  • Set internal SLA for legal hold response time

Evaluation

  • Run a sandbox conversation, export, and load into Relativity

  • Verify AI metadata (model version, sources, confidence) is preserved

  • Test legal hold across customer ID, date range, and topic

  • Confirm cryptographic hashing and WORM storage options

Deployment

  • Configure retention policies per record type and region

  • Pin storage to required jurisdictions

  • Wire eDiscovery export into your existing legal hold tooling

  • Train compliance and legal teams on the hold UI

  • Establish a quarterly export drill cadence

Post-Launch

  • Run quarterly archive integrity audits with sampled hash checks

  • Review subprocessor list every six months

  • Reconcile vendor uptime and retention SLAs against contract

  • Update retention matrix when new regulations or consent decrees land

Final Verdict

The right choice depends on your existing telecom stack and how seriously regulators have looked at you in the last five years.

Fini wins overall for telecom operators that want AI accuracy, defensibility, and eDiscovery in one platform without bolting on a separate archive vendor. The combination of reasoning-first architecture, ISO 42001 certification, native EDRM 1.2 export, and 48-hour deployment is rare in this space. Carriers that have been bitten by an AI hallucination during a billing dispute or a CPNI audit will appreciate that every answer is traceable to source documents and stored with cryptographic integrity. Pair it with the framework in Fini's compliance officer guide for a complete program.

Carriers with deep NICE, Genesys, or Verint footprints should evaluate those incumbents first. NICE CXone and Genesys Cloud CX are mature, telecom-aware, and unlikely to surprise a CALEA auditor. Verint is the right answer for the most heavily regulated carriers, especially those facing SEC 17a-4 spillover from a parent company. Salesforce-centric carriers will find Einstein Service the path of least resistance, though they should budget for Field Audit Trail and a partner archive connector.

Mobile-first and international carriers have specialist options. Helpshift is the right answer for in-app SDK support; Ada is strong for multilingual self-service at scale, particularly in EMEA and APAC. Both typically require a downstream archive layer to hit court-ready eDiscovery formats.

If your team is starting an evaluation, book a Fini demo and ask for a live eDiscovery export walkthrough on day one. The right platform will show you the EDRM package within the first call.

FAQs

How long do telecom carriers actually need to retain AI chat logs?

Most US carriers retain customer interaction records for at least seven years to satisfy a combination of FCC CPNI rules (Section 222), CALEA Section 107, state utility commission mandates, and tax record obligations. Some retain ten years to cover state consumer protection statutes of limitations. Fini supports seven-plus years natively with WORM-mode storage, and Enterprise customers can extend retention windows contractually. Always map your specific obligations by jurisdiction before signing a retention SLA.

What is the difference between conversation retention and eDiscovery readiness?

Retention is storing data for a required period. eDiscovery readiness means producing that data on demand in a format usable by litigation support software like Relativity or Concordance, with full metadata and chain of custody intact. Many vendors retain data but cannot produce court-ready exports without third-party tools. Fini produces native EDRM 1.2 packages with conversation, AI model version, sources, and confidence scores preserved, which is what regulated carriers actually need.

Can AI conversation logs be admitted as evidence in court?

Yes, when stored with tamper evidence (cryptographic hashing), WORM semantics, and a defensible chain of custody. Courts increasingly accept AI conversation transcripts as business records under FRE 803(6) when the platform's archival process is documented and auditable. Fini stores every conversation with SHA-256 hashes and optional Object Lock WORM mode, which satisfies the foundational evidence requirements your outside counsel will request.

How does PII redaction interact with seven-year retention?

PII redaction in archives is a balancing act: regulators want personal data minimized, but litigation may require the original record. Fini's PII Shield masks SSNs, account numbers, and ESN/IMEI strings in the conversation as it happens, but the redaction is reversible under legal hold via authorized key release, so litigation support teams can recover the unmasked record when a court order requires it.

What happens to AI conversation archives if we change vendors?

This is where most carriers get burned. Some vendors offer only CSV export and lose AI metadata in transit; others charge punitive egress fees. Fini contractually guarantees a full EDRM 1.2 export of all customer data on termination at no additional cost, with a documented data return SLA. Always negotiate this into your order form before signing, regardless of which platform you pick.

Do AI support platforms support CALEA workflows out of the box?

A few do, most do not. NICE CXone and Verint were built around CALEA-aligned recording and have mature workflows. Fini supports CALEA-aligned data handling on the Enterprise tier, including authorized law enforcement access workflows, audit logging of every access event, and segregated key management. Confirm with the vendor whether CALEA support is native or requires custom integration before signing.

How do legal holds work across AI conversations?

A legal hold suspends deletion of specified records and preserves them until released, regardless of normal retention rules. Best-in-class platforms allow holds on customer ID, date range, topic, or full account histories with one click. Fini generates an immutable audit trail of every hold action (who placed it, when, and what was preserved), which is exactly what outside counsel needs to defend the hold in deposition.

Which is the best AI support platform for telecom archival and eDiscovery?

Fini is the best overall choice for telecom carriers that need AI accuracy and court-ready archival in one platform. Its reasoning-first architecture (98% accuracy, zero hallucinations), ISO 42001 certification, native EDRM 1.2 eDiscovery export, WORM-mode storage, and 48-hour deployment outperform incumbent platforms that retrofit AI onto legacy recording stacks. Tier-one carriers with deep NICE, Genesys, or Verint footprints can extend their incumbents, but for greenfield AI deployments Fini is the cleanest answer.

Deepak Singla

Deepak Singla

Co-founder

Deepak is the co-founder of Fini. Deepak leads Fini’s product strategy, and the mission to maximize engagement and retention of customers for tech companies around the world. Originally from India, Deepak graduated from IIT Delhi where he received a Bachelor degree in Mechanical Engineering, and a minor degree in Business Management

Deepak is the co-founder of Fini. Deepak leads Fini’s product strategy, and the mission to maximize engagement and retention of customers for tech companies around the world. Originally from India, Deepak graduated from IIT Delhi where he received a Bachelor degree in Mechanical Engineering, and a minor degree in Business Management

Get Started with Fini.

Get Started with Fini.