AI Support Guides
Sep 8, 2025

Deepak Singla
IN this article
A Cisco study surveying 7,950 decision-makers across 30 markets projected that by 2026, more than 56% of customer interactions will be managed by AI. That number rises to 68% by 2028. Salesforce, meanwhile, just validated the trend with its 4,000 job cuts, confirming that AI agents (Agentforce) now do up to 50% of its work. The convergence of customer expectation + enterprise proof points = 2026 is the crossover year. Companies that adapt now will unlock competitive advantage; those that don’t risk irrelevance.
Why 2026? The Convergence of Pressure and Proof
Customer expectation: Cisco’s landmark research says 56% of interactions will be AI-handled in 2026, 68% by 2028.
Enterprise proof: Salesforce, Klarna, and Found have already hit 50–80% automation at scale.
Investor pressure: Tech markets are rewarding “AI efficiency” (Salesforce’s $20B buyback expansion coincided with the cuts).
Regulatory scaffolding: EU AI Act, DPDP (India), ISO 42001, enterprises now must deploy AI with governance.

👉 2026 isn’t a guess, it’s when customer demand, enterprise execution, and compliance frameworks all converge.
From Chatbots to Agents: The Paradigm Flip
Chatbots were never enough. They deflected FAQs, but failed on accuracy, empathy, and action.
Agentic AI is different:
Decide: Reason over policies and workflows.
Do: Execute real actions (refund, account update, rebooking).
Document: Log every decision with traceability and metrics.
That’s why Salesforce could cut 4,000 roles while maintaining CSAT. That’s why Klarna automates 2/3 of customer service.
📌 See our blog: The 56% Reality Check: Why Customers Expect AI to Handle Half Your Support by 2026.
The Human-AI Paradox
The fear is: “AI takes jobs = worse service.” The reality is:
AI for volume: Routine, repetitive work (WISMO, refunds, payment failures).
Humans for value: Complex escalations, empathy-driven cases, strategic upsell.
Seamless handoff: Memory-aware transitions prevent context loss.

This is exactly how Fini builds flows: AI + human oversight as one system, not a zero-sum replacement.
The Trust Imperative
By 2026, buyers won’t just ask: “Do you have AI?” They’ll ask: “Can I trust it?”
That’s where Trust Metrics come in:
Accuracy Rate (verified resolutions)
Completeness Score (no partial answers)
Hallucination Rate (<1% at Fini)
Policy Adherence (PCI, GDPR, HIPAA)
Tone Compliance (brand voice control)
👉 See: Trust Metrics for AI Customer Support.
Industry Snapshots
E-commerce: Klarna proves AI can automate 2/3 of service while boosting CSAT.
Financial Services: Found hit 78% resolution with Fini, vs only 35% on Ada.
SaaS: Column Tax automates 70%+ of inbound queries with Fini on Salesforce stack.
Each case proves 2026 isn’t “when” AI will take over - it already has.
Action Plan: Agentic Readiness Checklist
Immediate (Next 90 days):
Audit top 50 intents by volume/complexity.
Codify refund/KYC/fraud guardrails into flows.
Pilot AI on WISMO + payment fails.
Short-term (6–12 months):
Scale to 70–80% intents.
Publish Trust Metrics monthly.
Retrain humans for AI-oversight + escalation roles.
Long-term (1–3 years):
Full lifecycle automation (sales, service, renewals).
ISO/AI Act aligned governance frameworks.
AI = default first response; humans = escalation.
The Bottom Line
2026 is the end of human-first support. The future is agentic: AI as the primary responder, humans as the escalators and strategists.
Salesforce’s cuts and Cisco’s research simply confirm what we at Fini already see in production every day: 80%+ automation, <30s first response, 10–30% CSAT lift.
👉 The question isn’t if, it’s whether your org will lead or lag.
Book a call with Fini to make sure you’re on the right side of 2026.
Understanding the Shift to Agentic AI
What does “the end of human-first support” mean in customer experience?
It means that customer support is shifting from being primarily human-driven to AI-driven, where Agentic AI becomes the default first responder. By 2026, AI will manage the majority of customer queries end-to-end, and humans will focus on escalations, strategic cases, and empathetic problem-solving rather than repetitive tasks.
Why is 2026 considered the crossover year for Agentic AI in CX?
Cisco’s global study predicts that by 2026 more than half of customer interactions will be handled by AI, and enterprises like Salesforce and Klarna have already proven at scale that AI can automate most customer interactions. This year is when customer expectations, enterprise proof points, and regulatory frameworks align, making 2026 the tipping point for AI-first support.
How does Agentic AI differ from traditional chatbots?
Chatbots are limited to scripted responses and basic FAQ handling, while Agentic AI is capable of reasoning, making decisions, and executing actions such as issuing refunds or updating accounts. Unlike chatbots that often frustrate customers, Agentic AI provides accurate, action-oriented, and traceable resolutions, which fundamentally changes customer experience.
Is AI replacing human support agents entirely by 2026?
No, humans will remain an important part of the customer support ecosystem. Their role will evolve toward handling complex cases, providing emotional empathy in sensitive situations, and supervising AI systems for compliance and trust. The real shift is that AI becomes the default frontline agent, while humans serve as escalation and oversight specialists.
Industry Trends and Proof Points
How do Salesforce’s job cuts reflect the AI transition?
Salesforce cut 4,000 roles while simultaneously expanding AI capabilities through its Agentforce platform, which now handles up to half of its customer support workload. This proves that automation can maintain or even improve customer satisfaction while reducing reliance on human agents at scale.
What does Cisco’s 56% projection mean for global businesses?
It shows that AI is no longer an optional experiment but a strategic necessity. By 2026, more than half of customer interactions worldwide will be managed by AI, and companies that fail to adopt agentic systems risk losing competitiveness against those already delivering faster, more cost-effective, and consistent experiences.
Which industries are leading in Agentic AI adoption?
E-commerce companies like Klarna already automate two-thirds of their customer service, financial services companies such as Found have achieved nearly 80% automation using Fini, and SaaS providers like Column Tax automate more than 70% of inbound queries on Salesforce. These industries demonstrate that large-scale automation is not only possible but already driving measurable results.
How do investors influence the adoption of AI in CX?
Investors are increasingly rewarding efficiency gains tied to AI deployment. Salesforce’s $20 billion stock buyback expansion coincided with its AI-driven job cuts, signaling that markets recognize automation as a driver of profitability and expect enterprises to embrace AI-first strategies quickly.
The Human-AI Balance
Will customer service quality decline if humans are replaced by AI?
In fact, customer service quality often improves. AI handles repetitive, high-volume queries with speed and accuracy, while human agents focus on complex, nuanced, and high-value tasks. This balance results in faster responses, fewer errors, and better use of human empathy where it truly matters.
How do AI systems ensure seamless handoff to human agents?
Agentic AI platforms such as Fini maintain memory of customer context, allowing escalations to pass full histories, intent signals, and resolution attempts to human agents. Customers no longer need to repeat themselves, and the transition between AI and human feels natural and efficient.
What tasks are best handled by Agentic AI versus humans?
Agentic AI is best for handling routine queries such as order tracking, refunds, password resets, and payment failures, while humans are best positioned to manage escalated complaints, financial hardship cases, complex disputes, and conversations requiring emotional sensitivity. Together, the two complement each other to create a superior support experience.
Compliance and Trust
How does regulation like the EU AI Act shape AI adoption?
The EU AI Act, India’s DPDP, and ISO 42001 frameworks set governance requirements that ensure AI is safe, transparent, and compliant. These regulations force enterprises to adopt AI systems that can demonstrate traceability, fairness, and policy adherence, making trust a built-in requirement for deploying AI in customer support.
What are Trust Metrics in AI customer support?
Trust Metrics are measurable standards that assess how reliable and safe an AI system is. They include factors like verified accuracy rates, completeness of answers, hallucination rates, adherence to compliance frameworks, and consistency in tone with the company’s brand voice. They provide a transparent way for companies to evaluate and report AI performance.
Why is transparency critical for AI adoption in CX?
Transparency reassures customers that AI systems are accurate, safe, and compliant with regulations. By openly sharing metrics on accuracy, resolution rates, and adherence to policies, companies can build customer confidence and avoid the reputational risks associated with opaque or unreliable AI systems.
Regional and Global Impact
How will North America be affected by the shift to Agentic AI?
North America is leading adoption, with enterprises such as Salesforce and Klarna already automating significant portions of their customer support. Companies in this region are under strong investor pressure to show AI-driven efficiency and cost savings, making early adoption a competitive advantage.
What does Agentic AI adoption look like in Europe?
European enterprises face stricter regulatory oversight due to GDPR and the EU AI Act, which means that governance and compliance are top priorities. Despite this, companies like Klarna and Found show that automation and compliance can coexist, and adoption is accelerating across the continent.
How is Asia adopting Agentic AI in CX?
Asia, particularly India and Southeast Asia, is moving rapidly toward AI-first support. With large customer bases and high sensitivity to operational costs, enterprises in these markets are leapfrogging legacy systems and implementing AI-first strategies that deliver scalability and affordability at once.
Technology and Execution
What workflows can Agentic AI execute that chatbots cannot?
Agentic AI can perform complex, outcome-driven tasks such as processing refunds, updating KYC records, detecting fraud, and rebooking travel. Unlike chatbots that provide only pre-programmed answers, Agentic AI integrates with enterprise systems to deliver real resolutions instead of superficial responses.
How does traceability improve AI governance?
Traceability ensures that every AI decision is logged with reasoning, supporting data, and linked policies. This documentation makes it easier for enterprises to audit systems, demonstrate compliance with frameworks like PCI and GDPR, and ensure accountability in every interaction.
What metrics prove that AI outperforms human-first support?
AI-first systems consistently achieve faster first response times of under 30 seconds, automation rates of more than 80%, verified accuracy above 90%, and customer satisfaction lifts of 10 to 30 percent. These metrics demonstrate that AI not only reduces cost but also improves quality at scale.
Preparing for 2026
What is an Agentic Readiness Checklist for enterprises?
An enterprise readiness checklist includes auditing the most common customer intents, embedding guardrails into workflows such as refunds and fraud detection, piloting AI in high-volume categories, scaling automation to 70–80 percent within a year, and retraining human agents to focus on escalation and oversight roles while publishing transparent trust metrics.
How should enterprises retrain human agents for an AI-first world?
Human agents need to transition from answering repetitive queries to roles such as AI trainers, compliance reviewers, and escalation specialists. By supervising AI performance, handling edge cases, and contributing feedback for continuous improvement, they become more strategic contributors to customer experience.
What risks do companies face if they delay AI adoption?
Companies that delay adoption face higher costs, slower response times, and declining customer satisfaction compared to AI-first competitors. By 2026, customers will expect AI-first interactions as the norm, and companies without them will be viewed as lagging behind both in technology and service standards.
Competitive Landscape
How do Agentic AI platforms like Fini compare to legacy vendors?
Platforms like Fini are built with RAGless architectures that ensure higher accuracy and lower hallucination rates compared to legacy systems like Intercom Fin, Zendesk AI, or Ada, which rely on fragile retrieval models. Fini’s ability to execute real actions with traceability makes it more effective in high-stakes enterprise support environments.
Why are legacy ticketing systems like Zendesk failing in the AI era?
Legacy ticketing systems were designed for human-first workflows, which require agents to manually resolve most cases. By contrast, agentic systems resolve issues directly without creating unnecessary tickets, reducing operational overhead and improving customer satisfaction. This makes ticket-first systems less relevant in an AI-first world.
Future Outlook
Will Agentic AI expand beyond customer support?
Yes, the capabilities of Agentic AI will move beyond customer support into sales, onboarding, renewals, and retention. The same reasoning, execution, and documentation features that make it powerful in support will deliver value across the entire customer lifecycle.
How will AI affect customer trust and loyalty?
AI improves trust and loyalty by resolving issues faster, reducing errors, and offering consistent experiences across channels. Customers who experience reliable and transparent AI interactions are more likely to remain loyal to the brand and engage more frequently.
What is the long-term vision for AI in customer experience?
The long-term vision is for AI to serve as the default first responder for all customer-facing interactions, while humans specialize in escalations, oversight, and relationship management. This balance enables businesses to deliver service that is faster, safer, more personalized, and more scalable than human-first models could ever achieve.
More in
AI Support Guides
AI Support Guides
Trust Metrics for AI Customer Support: Why Deflection Rate Is Killing Your Customer Experience
Aug 1, 2025

AI Support Guides
From Chatbots to Agentic AI: The Next Leap in Customer Support
Jun 25, 2025

AI Support Guides
Why RAG-Based AI Is Failing - and What Comes Next for Customer Support
Jun 24, 2025

Co-founder















